header-logo header-logo

Training & education

Subscribe

CILEx examines why employers are embracing on-the-job training

The Bar Standards Board considers what could be the most sweeping reforms to barristers’ training in a generation

Nigel Tomlinson explains why law firms need to rewrite their professional development & training programmes

Martin Burns underlines the importance of committing to continuous learning & development

Why LERNing matters. Patricia Leighton explains why it pays to invest in research into legal education

Are you prepared for increased anti-money laundering compliance scrutiny, asks Dr Tony Harvey

New Awards celebrate excellence in conveyancing

R (on the application of Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2014] EWCA Civ 1216, [2014] All ER (D) 85 (Sep)

Julie Brannan introduces the new plans for CPD

Can paralegals meet the market needs of the future, asks Stephen Gowland

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll