header-logo header-logo

Wagner International AG and other companies v Earlex Ltd [2012] EWHC 984 (Pat), [2012] All ER (D) 83 (Apr)

Chaudery v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 372 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 86 (Apr)

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2012] EWCA Civ 421, [2012] All ER (D) 58 (Apr)

Halpin v Sandpiper Books Ltd UKEAT/071/11/LA, [2012] All ER (D) 59 (Apr)

Zdinjak v Croatia [2012] All ER (D) 21 (Apr)

Coombs v Dorset NHS Primary Care Trust and another [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 42 (Apr)

AC and others v TR and another [2012] EWHC 796 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 26 (Apr)

Raithatha (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Michael Roy Williamson) v Williamson [2012] EWHC 909 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 909 (Apr)

DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail Ltd) [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Apr)

Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (in scheme of arrangement) and other cases [2012] UKSC 14, [2012] All ER (D) 201 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll