header-logo header-logo

All in good faith

26 May 2011 / Felicia Epstein
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

When does an employee owe fiduciary duties, asks Felicia Epstein

It has become common, in the employment context, to assert the existence of a duty of fidelity distinct from fiduciary duties. As Robert Flannigan pointed out in his article “The [Fiduciary] Duty of Fidelity” ((2008) 124 LQR 274), the duty of fidelity is an invention and “faith, good faith, fidelity and loyalty arguably are too closely associated with conventional fiduciary responsibility to serve usefully as sharp descriptors of other functions”. Perhaps for this reason, it is difficult to distinguish between an employee’s duty of fidelity and any fiduciary duties they may owe. It has been commonly stated that all employees are subject to a duty of fidelity but only those in a position with specific powers and responsibilities have fiduciary duties that would include reporting their own misconduct or that of fellow employees.

Global Risks

In Lonmar Global Risks Ltd v West and others [2011] IRLR 138 the claimant sued Tyser Limited, a competitor in the international intermediary brokering market, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll