header-logo header-logo

An increase in GHR: now is not the time

26 March 2021 / John Brown
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
43905
John Brown highlights some shortcomings in the Guideline Hourly Rates Review

In January 2021, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published its consultation on Guideline Hourly Rates (GHR). The raison d’etre for GHR is to give the inexperienced judge a benchmark for assessing the reasonableness of hourly rates claimed by lawyers in civil and commercial claims, without the GHR being a substitute for the proper exercise of judicial discretion.

As lawyers calculate their fees by applying hourly rates to time claimed, the GHR heavily influence the amount of legal costs recoverable by law firms in England and Wales in successful claims brought against the NHS, local and central government (ie, ultimately the taxpayer), insurers, compensators, and private litigants.

For instance, the proposed new GHR would increase the NHS’s annual spend on legal costs by tens of millions of pounds; over a ten-year period, NHS spend would increase by hundreds of millions of pounds.

Last but not least, there is a new elephant in the room–consumer protection. Post

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll