header-logo header-logo

11 February 2021
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

CILEx shakes up legal market with solicitor-equivalent CPQ

Institute to offer solicitor-equivalent qualification for a third of the price

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) has launched a less expensive rival to the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE).

The CPQ (CILEx Professional Qualification) will have three levels―Foundation, which is aligned to the role of a paralegal; Advanced, for those handling cases at an advanced paralegal level; and Professional, for those who want to be CILEx Lawyers.

A CILEx Lawyer will have equivalent rights to a solicitor within their particular practice area. Eight specialisations will be available initially, including litigation, employment, private client and conveyancing.

The whole process, including training, assessment and course materials, costs £12,500. By comparison, CILEX estimates the SQE route will cost students about £40,000.

Each stage is likely to take between 18 months and two years; therefore the full qualification could be achieved in five to six years. Students with law degrees or postgraduate legal qualifications can potentially join at the end of Advanced level and qualify in two to three years. Students will combine work with study, thereby earning while they learn. Current Chartered Legal Executives can take a conversion course.

Linda Ford, CILEx CEO, said she expected an initial cohort of 400 students to start in June, subject to Legal Services Board approval at Easter time. Another 400 students are expected to start at the Advanced stage.

‘We consulted with employers in private practice, in-house and in local government about what they needed, such as commercial and legal tech skills, and tailored accordingly,’ Ford said.

‘Our view is some opportunities have been missed with the SQE and there is an issue about how accessible it actually is, when students require a degree. We also think they missed a chance to review the solicitor standard, and could have listened more to employers, for example, about the need for business and legal tech skills.’  

Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll