header-logo header-logo

11 February 2021
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

CILEx shakes up legal market with solicitor-equivalent CPQ

Institute to offer solicitor-equivalent qualification for a third of the price

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) has launched a less expensive rival to the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE).

The CPQ (CILEx Professional Qualification) will have three levels―Foundation, which is aligned to the role of a paralegal; Advanced, for those handling cases at an advanced paralegal level; and Professional, for those who want to be CILEx Lawyers.

A CILEx Lawyer will have equivalent rights to a solicitor within their particular practice area. Eight specialisations will be available initially, including litigation, employment, private client and conveyancing.

The whole process, including training, assessment and course materials, costs £12,500. By comparison, CILEX estimates the SQE route will cost students about £40,000.

Each stage is likely to take between 18 months and two years; therefore the full qualification could be achieved in five to six years. Students with law degrees or postgraduate legal qualifications can potentially join at the end of Advanced level and qualify in two to three years. Students will combine work with study, thereby earning while they learn. Current Chartered Legal Executives can take a conversion course.

Linda Ford, CILEx CEO, said she expected an initial cohort of 400 students to start in June, subject to Legal Services Board approval at Easter time. Another 400 students are expected to start at the Advanced stage.

‘We consulted with employers in private practice, in-house and in local government about what they needed, such as commercial and legal tech skills, and tailored accordingly,’ Ford said.

‘Our view is some opportunities have been missed with the SQE and there is an issue about how accessible it actually is, when students require a degree. We also think they missed a chance to review the solicitor standard, and could have listened more to employers, for example, about the need for business and legal tech skills.’  

Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll