header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Civil legal aid: too little, too late?

204796
Reading between the lines of the government’s latest review of the civil legal aid system, Roger Smith unearths the same old fundamental problems at its heart

Over the new year, I read the suite of seven final reports of the Ministry of Justice’s review of civil legal aid. I did so with a heavy heart. For what is now nigh on a half century, too many of these attempts to identify ‘evidence-based options’ for future legal aid policy have rolled across my desk like tumbleweed through a Western desert. This version suffers from the crucial structural weaknesses of most of its predecessors. But, within those limitations, there are, to quote Leonard Cohen, some cracks where ‘the light gets in’.

Structural weaknesses

And the structural weaknesses endemic to this sort of exercise? The first is political, and the second methodological. This review was established in January 2023 by Dominic Raab, a now deservedly forgotten footnote to history as Boris Johnson’s one-time deputy prime minister. It was designed—after more than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll