header-logo header-logo

Civil legal aid: too little, too late?

24 January 2025 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
204796
Reading between the lines of the government’s latest review of the civil legal aid system, Roger Smith unearths the same old fundamental problems at its heart

Over the new year, I read the suite of seven final reports of the Ministry of Justice’s review of civil legal aid. I did so with a heavy heart. For what is now nigh on a half century, too many of these attempts to identify ‘evidence-based options’ for future legal aid policy have rolled across my desk like tumbleweed through a Western desert. This version suffers from the crucial structural weaknesses of most of its predecessors. But, within those limitations, there are, to quote Leonard Cohen, some cracks where ‘the light gets in’.

Structural weaknesses

And the structural weaknesses endemic to this sort of exercise? The first is political, and the second methodological. This review was established in January 2023 by Dominic Raab, a now deservedly forgotten footnote to history as Boris Johnson’s one-time deputy prime minister. It was designed—after more than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll