header-logo header-logo

20 October 2016 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Cost benefit analysis

Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood

    • Wasted costs orders in civil litigation—a rapidly developing area of law.

    Wasted costs orders can only be made against a representative, whereas non-party costs orders can be made against anyone, including a representative.

    In both cases the power derives from s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Sub-section (3) provides that “the court shall have full power to determine by whom and to what extent the costs are to be paid” and this covers the county court, High Court and the civil division of the Court of Appeal (s 51(1)).

    This piece deals with wasted costs orders in civil litigation (but there are similar sanctions in the criminal courts and in tribunals) and non-party costs orders.

    Wasted costs

    Wasted costs includes disallowing costs and ordering payment of costs (s 51(6)) and can be at the suit of the representative’s own client or the other side

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

    Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

    Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

    Switalskis—four appointments

    Switalskis—four appointments

    Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

    mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

    mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

    Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

    NEWS
    What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
    Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
    When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
    When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
    NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
    back-to-top-scroll