header-logo header-logo

Cost benefit analysis

20 October 2016 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood

    • Wasted costs orders in civil litigation—a rapidly developing area of law.

    Wasted costs orders can only be made against a representative, whereas non-party costs orders can be made against anyone, including a representative.

    In both cases the power derives from s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Sub-section (3) provides that “the court shall have full power to determine by whom and to what extent the costs are to be paid” and this covers the county court, High Court and the civil division of the Court of Appeal (s 51(1)).

    This piece deals with wasted costs orders in civil litigation (but there are similar sanctions in the criminal courts and in tribunals) and non-party costs orders.

    Wasted costs

    Wasted costs includes disallowing costs and ordering payment of costs (s 51(6)) and can be at the suit of the representative’s own client or the other side

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    FOIL—Bridget Tatham

    FOIL—Bridget Tatham

    Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

    Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

    Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

    Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

    Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

    Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

    Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

    NEWS
    Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
    Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
    Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
    NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
    Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
    back-to-top-scroll