header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / William Gibson
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs conundrum (5)

wpt026_4

Bill Gibson emphasises the importance of file maintenance to costs recovery

In the days before judicial interest in costs led to confusion and complications, the most common request from solicitors to costs draftsmen was: “How do I maximise my inter partes costs recovery?”

The answer was usually: “File maintenance/file discipline.”

Detailed attendance notes recording the content of meetings or telephone calls; letters confirming oral advice; time spent on documents accurately recorded and broken down between different categories; time spent on jointly-attended meetings recorded in the same figures by all attendees. Simple.

Then came conditional fee agreements with success fees. More discipline. Record risk assessment investigations, outcomes and advice and be prepared to justify on assessment. Next: detailed investigations into availability of before the event insurance cover. The common theme running throughout was the need for detailed and accurate records, something not always popular with fee earners but litigators at least grudgingly accepted there was a reason for such effort. That reason became more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll