header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Half of barristers’ businesses could collapse in six months without financial assistance

An alarming 30% of barristers say they are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19, and more than half expect to in future, according to the latest Bar Council research

An alarming 30% of barristers say they are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19, and more than half expect to in future, according to the latest Bar Council research

Although the courts are conducting hearings remotely where possible and continuing to hold essential hearings in person, practitioners have experienced a major drop-off in hearings and other work, the Bar Council said. 3,470 barristers (20% of the total) responded to its survey, published this week.

The survey found 65% of self-employed barristers have seen a reduction in work―the typical barrister has gone from working more than 50 hours to fewer than 18 hours per week.

However, only 14% of the self-employed bar are applying for the government’s rescue scheme (the self-employed income support scheme (SEISS)), and only five per cent said they would apply for the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme. Regarding the loan scheme, the survey reported ‘considerable reluctance to take on further debt when it is unclear when and how it can be paid back. Those who become bankrupt are prohibited from practising at the Bar’.

Applicants for SEISS grants must have filed a 2018/19 tax return, been self-employed before 6 April 2019, earn more than 50% of income through self-employment and have an annual trading profit of less than £50,000.

In terms of business sustainability, 53% of self-employed say they can’t survive six months under current conditions without financial aid of some sort, and 74% can’t survive a year. The situation is worse for the criminal bar, where 31% of barristers say they would not last three months without financial aid, 69% would not last six months and 88% would no longer be practising within a year.

Barristers in the first seven years of practice are the most vulnerable―83% say they can’t survive a year under current conditions without financial aid.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council (pictured), said: ‘Barristers and others involved in the justice system are rightly classed as key workers by the government, because they are essential to ensuring that justice continues to be delivered for the public, despite the pandemic.

‘A threat to the barristers’ profession survival is a threat to the future of our justice system… we might very well find there are no barristers left to help pick up the pieces of the justice system after the crisis subsides.’

The Bar Council has called on the Treasury to expand its rescue scheme to increase the threshold above £50,000 trading profit for self-employed barristers so that more of the junior bar will be eligible, and to allow different types of evidence for the self-employed scheme so that those without 2018/19 tax returns can apply. It is also calling for an urgent rescue package for those at the publicly funded bar who are ineligible for the self-employed scheme.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll