header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Protecting retailers

Safeguards for commercial tenants may need to be extended beyond the duration of COVID-19, lawyers have warned

Business secretary Alok Sharma announced temporary measures last week to protect retailers against aggressive debt recovery actions during the pandemic.

Statutory demands made between 1 March and 30 June, and winding-up petitions presented between 27 April and 30 June, will be temporarily voided. The measures will be included in the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill, which Sharma set out earlier this month.

The government is laying secondary legislation to give tenants longer to pay rent by preventing landlords using Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) unless they are owed 90 days of unpaid rent. A three-month moratorium on evictions is already in place, due to end on 24 June.

City law firm RPC partners welcomed the measures, but called on the government to reassure retailers they would be protected beyond the lockdown.

RPC real estate partner Elizabeth Alibhai said the ban on winding-up petitions was ‘extremely positive news for retailers impacted by coronavirus and closes a loophole where landlords were using insolvency processes to get around the government's previously announced ban on evictions.

‘However, it is vitally important that these protective measures endure long enough for retailers to get back on their feet. To give these businesses a fighting chance of overcoming the many challenges they face, the moratorium should be in place for at least the next 3-6 months.’

The firm also highlighted procedural uncertainty as to how the protection is obtained or enforced. Sharma’s announcement suggested it would be a decision for the courts, but the RPC partners said a court makes its initial consideration of a petition at the first hearing, by which stage the petition has been advertised and many of the adverse consequences have already occurred.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll