header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Protecting retailers

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Safeguards for commercial tenants may need to be extended beyond the duration of COVID-19, lawyers have warned

Business secretary Alok Sharma announced temporary measures last week to protect retailers against aggressive debt recovery actions during the pandemic.

Statutory demands made between 1 March and 30 June, and winding-up petitions presented between 27 April and 30 June, will be temporarily voided. The measures will be included in the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill, which Sharma set out earlier this month.

The government is laying secondary legislation to give tenants longer to pay rent by preventing landlords using Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) unless they are owed 90 days of unpaid rent. A three-month moratorium on evictions is already in place, due to end on 24 June.

City law firm RPC partners welcomed the measures, but called on the government to reassure retailers they would be protected beyond the lockdown.

RPC real estate partner Elizabeth Alibhai said the ban on winding-up petitions was ‘extremely positive news for retailers impacted by coronavirus and closes a loophole where landlords were using insolvency processes to get around the government's previously announced ban on evictions.

‘However, it is vitally important that these protective measures endure long enough for retailers to get back on their feet. To give these businesses a fighting chance of overcoming the many challenges they face, the moratorium should be in place for at least the next 3-6 months.’

The firm also highlighted procedural uncertainty as to how the protection is obtained or enforced. Sharma’s announcement suggested it would be a decision for the courts, but the RPC partners said a court makes its initial consideration of a petition at the first hearing, by which stage the petition has been advertised and many of the adverse consequences have already occurred.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll