header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Protecting retailers

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Safeguards for commercial tenants may need to be extended beyond the duration of COVID-19, lawyers have warned

Business secretary Alok Sharma announced temporary measures last week to protect retailers against aggressive debt recovery actions during the pandemic.

Statutory demands made between 1 March and 30 June, and winding-up petitions presented between 27 April and 30 June, will be temporarily voided. The measures will be included in the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill, which Sharma set out earlier this month.

The government is laying secondary legislation to give tenants longer to pay rent by preventing landlords using Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) unless they are owed 90 days of unpaid rent. A three-month moratorium on evictions is already in place, due to end on 24 June.

City law firm RPC partners welcomed the measures, but called on the government to reassure retailers they would be protected beyond the lockdown.

RPC real estate partner Elizabeth Alibhai said the ban on winding-up petitions was ‘extremely positive news for retailers impacted by coronavirus and closes a loophole where landlords were using insolvency processes to get around the government's previously announced ban on evictions.

‘However, it is vitally important that these protective measures endure long enough for retailers to get back on their feet. To give these businesses a fighting chance of overcoming the many challenges they face, the moratorium should be in place for at least the next 3-6 months.’

The firm also highlighted procedural uncertainty as to how the protection is obtained or enforced. Sharma’s announcement suggested it would be a decision for the courts, but the RPC partners said a court makes its initial consideration of a petition at the first hearing, by which stage the petition has been advertised and many of the adverse consequences have already occurred.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll