header-logo header-logo

Crossing boundaries

01 August 2014 / James Wilson
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
backpage_law-stories

James Wilson revisits the landmark discrimination case of Constantine v Imperial Hotel

One of the best-known discrimination cases in recent years concerned the proprietors of a B&B wanting to impose conditions on the rooms they were prepared to let to guests. In Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 73, the Supreme Court eventually ruled that the proprietors were not permitted lawfully to refuse to let a room with a double bed to a same-sex couple, despite the proprietors’ sincerely-held religious beliefs about marriage. The ruling was not without controversy, but it was certainly not disputed that as a general proposition people should not be discriminated against on the basis of arbitrary factors such as gender, orientation or race.

Seven decades ago, however, things were rather different. None of the modern legal weapons against such discrimination existed. Thus, when the famous cricketer Learie Constantine was turned away from a hotel during the Second World War for no reason other than the colour of his skin, his remedies at law were much more limited. But he went on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll