header-logo header-logo

Crossing boundaries

01 August 2014 / James Wilson
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
backpage_law-stories

James Wilson revisits the landmark discrimination case of Constantine v Imperial Hotel

One of the best-known discrimination cases in recent years concerned the proprietors of a B&B wanting to impose conditions on the rooms they were prepared to let to guests. In Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 73, the Supreme Court eventually ruled that the proprietors were not permitted lawfully to refuse to let a room with a double bed to a same-sex couple, despite the proprietors’ sincerely-held religious beliefs about marriage. The ruling was not without controversy, but it was certainly not disputed that as a general proposition people should not be discriminated against on the basis of arbitrary factors such as gender, orientation or race.

Seven decades ago, however, things were rather different. None of the modern legal weapons against such discrimination existed. Thus, when the famous cricketer Learie Constantine was turned away from a hotel during the Second World War for no reason other than the colour of his skin, his remedies at law were much more limited. But he went on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll