header-logo header-logo

Draft Directive threatens casual workers

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

News

Renewed EU and union pressure to resurrect the draft Agency Workers Directive could jeopardise up to 250,000 UK temporary placements, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) says.

The draft Directive proposes putting agency workers on an equal footing with permanent staff after six weeks on an assignment. This, says the CBI, would reduce the key benefit of flexibility such workers offer to firms, undermining the incentive to employ them. EU government officials meet this week to discuss a Portuguese Presidency paper, which proposes ways to resurrect the Directive.

The 2007 CBI/Pertemps annual employment trends survey of over 500 firms, which between them employ 1.1 million staff, shows that at any time 3% of employees are temporary.

However, 58% of employers said such a law would lead to a “significant” cut in the use of temporary workers. Of the firms surveyed, 62% said the Directive in its current form would damage flexibility, 65% believed it would significantly increase costs and 58% said it would mean additional bureaucracy. The CBI’s deputy director-general, John Cridland, says: “As proposed, the Directive would seriously undermine the flexibility that temps offer to firms, hurting the economy and making them far more likely to rely on overtime flexibility from existing workers instead.”

The survey also reveals that 95% of employers are offering at least one form of flexible working practice. The most dramatic increase has been in teleworking—staff working on the move or from home—which is now offered by almost half (46%) of employers, four times as many as in 2004 (11%).

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll