header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Blogs , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Educating lawyers

The current review of legal training leads Geoffrey Bindman to ponder his own experience

The Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, and the Institute of Legal Executives are embarking on a two year review of legal education and training. The upheavals in legal practice which are about to overwhelm us make such a review timely and it is heartening that these bodies are combining in a joint enterprise.

My own legal education took place in the 1950s, since when the forms of legal practice have expanded and become polarised. Yet the kernel of the legal vocation to which I remain committed has not changed. It is the help that people need to confront the vast range of problems which cannot be solved without specialist knowledge and understanding of the legal and administrative structures of our society. The purpose of legal education and training is to give lawyers the means to provide that help effectively.

Not fit for purpose

In his recent contribution to the “Clementi debate”, Derek Wood QC, who has played

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll