header-logo header-logo

Educating lawyers

30 June 2011 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Blogs , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The current review of legal training leads Geoffrey Bindman to ponder his own experience

The Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, and the Institute of Legal Executives are embarking on a two year review of legal education and training. The upheavals in legal practice which are about to overwhelm us make such a review timely and it is heartening that these bodies are combining in a joint enterprise.

My own legal education took place in the 1950s, since when the forms of legal practice have expanded and become polarised. Yet the kernel of the legal vocation to which I remain committed has not changed. It is the help that people need to confront the vast range of problems which cannot be solved without specialist knowledge and understanding of the legal and administrative structures of our society. The purpose of legal education and training is to give lawyers the means to provide that help effectively.

Not fit for purpose

In his recent contribution to the “Clementi debate”, Derek Wood QC, who has played

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll