header-logo header-logo

Educating lawyers

30 June 2011 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Blogs , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The current review of legal training leads Geoffrey Bindman to ponder his own experience

The Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, and the Institute of Legal Executives are embarking on a two year review of legal education and training. The upheavals in legal practice which are about to overwhelm us make such a review timely and it is heartening that these bodies are combining in a joint enterprise.

My own legal education took place in the 1950s, since when the forms of legal practice have expanded and become polarised. Yet the kernel of the legal vocation to which I remain committed has not changed. It is the help that people need to confront the vast range of problems which cannot be solved without specialist knowledge and understanding of the legal and administrative structures of our society. The purpose of legal education and training is to give lawyers the means to provide that help effectively.

Not fit for purpose

In his recent contribution to the “Clementi debate”, Derek Wood QC, who has played

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll