header-logo header-logo

Employers to pay price

07 July 2017
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Higher sentences proposed for reckless & negligent employers

Employers who commit manslaughter could face higher custodial sentences, from eight to 18 years in the most serious cases, under draft guidelines drawn up by the Sentencing Council.

In a consultation published this week, ‘Manslaughter Guideline Consultation’, the council proposes tougher penalties for gross negligence manslaughter, where the offender is in breach of a duty of care towards the victim, which causes the death of the victim and amounts to a criminal act or omission. This could include employers who ‘completely disregard’ the safety of employees or doctors whose care of a patient falls far below the required standard, the Council said. Currently, there is only limited sentencing guidance for manslaughter, and these are the first set of comprehensive guidelines for the offence.

The Council said its proposals were based on an analysis of current sentencing practice, with little change in sentence levels for most areas apart from in some gross negligence cases. It said judges currently tend to order more lenient sentences in gross negligence cases where, for example, employers ignore safety in order to cut costs.

Sentencing Council member Mr Justice Holroyde said: ‘The guidelines aim to ensure sentencing that properly reflects both the culpability of the offender and the seriousness of the harm which has been caused.’

Some 16 offenders were sentenced for manslaughter by gross negligence in 2014, incurring custodial sentences ranging from nine months to 12 years, four of which were suspended. The median sentence length was four years.

The consultation ends on 10 October 2017.

Issue: 7753 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll