header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 9 May 2025

217910
Feeling like challenging the rules? Ian Smith saddles up & considers some cautionary tales on less favourable treatment, whistleblowing protection for jobseekers & more
  • Part-time workers: less favourable treatment of part-time workers must be solely because of their part-time status.
  • Express vs implied terms: express terms in employment contracts should be considered and applied before implying any terms.
  • Whistleblowing laws: job applicants are not covered by whistleblowing laws, except for NHS applicants.
  • Disclosure and inspection: employment tribunals can order disclosure of information, not just documents.
  • Costs and vexatious conduct: conduct that impinges on proceedings can justify a costs order.

The most newsworthy event in the last month in employment/discrimination law was, of course, the decision of the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 on the meaning of ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010. This has been considered specifically elsewhere in NLJ (see ‘Equality Act 2010—“man”, “woman” & “sex” defined’, NLJ, 2 May 2025,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll