header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 9 May 2025

217910
Feeling like challenging the rules? Ian Smith saddles up & considers some cautionary tales on less favourable treatment, whistleblowing protection for jobseekers & more
  • Part-time workers: less favourable treatment of part-time workers must be solely because of their part-time status.
  • Express vs implied terms: express terms in employment contracts should be considered and applied before implying any terms.
  • Whistleblowing laws: job applicants are not covered by whistleblowing laws, except for NHS applicants.
  • Disclosure and inspection: employment tribunals can order disclosure of information, not just documents.
  • Costs and vexatious conduct: conduct that impinges on proceedings can justify a costs order.

The most newsworthy event in the last month in employment/discrimination law was, of course, the decision of the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 on the meaning of ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010. This has been considered specifically elsewhere in NLJ (see ‘Equality Act 2010—“man”, “woman” & “sex” defined’, NLJ, 2 May 2025,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll