header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Litigants in person
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 7 May 2021

48115
In this month’s brief, Ian Smith serves up some insight into items which are always on the employment law menu
  • Are foster carers workers?
  • Constructive dismissal: too late to make amends.
  • Striking out a litigant in person’s case.

Employment status is always on the menu in employment law. The first case considered this month addresses ‘worker’ status, but with two twists—it arose in the context of trade union law, and its subject is the very unusual legal position of foster carers. The Court of Appeal has come down in their favour, stressing how specific to their case the decision is, but encouragement is given to appeal further to the Supreme Court where the gloves would be off and reconsideration could be given to their position in the law generally, possibly leading to the extension to them of employment rights generally. The second case addresses a potentially important issue in human relations practice—if management has behaved badly to an employee who is threatening to leave and claim constructive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll