header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 August 2022

90406
Common law under attack? Ian Smith reports on the latest cases from the Court of Appeal & a particularly busy spell for Lord Justice Bean & Lady Justice Simler
  • No limit on the power to terminate on proper notice.
  • Upholding the ‘least burdensome’ principle.
  • Explaining the separability principle.

The last month has seen two awaited decisions of the Supreme Court, in Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21, [2022] All ER (D) 72 (Jul) on the statutory holiday pay entitlement of a part-year (as opposed to a part-time) worker, and in Basfar v Wong [2022] UKSC 20, [2022] All ER (D) 15 (Jul) on the application of diplomatic immunity in cases of alleged modern slavery (also of interest as it is the first leapfrog appeal from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) directly to the Supreme Court). These will doubtless be debated elsewhere. The cases considered in this brief were at Court of Appeal level and considered important principles of the common law of employment which in one way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll