header-logo header-logo

29 July 2011 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fight for the right

zrc011_4

Ian Smith enters into the tussle between employment law & human rights

The column this month is, unusually, devoted to only one case. There are currently an unusual number of cases on employment law before the Supreme Court. One very important one on whether and, if so, when “loss of career” damages may be awarded in a common law action was heard towards the end of June (Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Trust) and its result is awaited with a mixture of fascination and trepidation. In the meantime, we have had the first judgment in the forthcoming series of them, concerning the always controversial area of the interaction of employment law and human rights law, this time in the context of rights to representation before internal disciplinary hearings.

The question of representation

R (G) v Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30, [2011] All ER (D) 220 (Jun) is the much awaited Supreme Court decision on the question which has arisen in the last couple

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll