header-logo header-logo

29 July 2011 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fight for the right

zrc011_4

Ian Smith enters into the tussle between employment law & human rights

The column this month is, unusually, devoted to only one case. There are currently an unusual number of cases on employment law before the Supreme Court. One very important one on whether and, if so, when “loss of career” damages may be awarded in a common law action was heard towards the end of June (Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Trust) and its result is awaited with a mixture of fascination and trepidation. In the meantime, we have had the first judgment in the forthcoming series of them, concerning the always controversial area of the interaction of employment law and human rights law, this time in the context of rights to representation before internal disciplinary hearings.

The question of representation

R (G) v Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30, [2011] All ER (D) 220 (Jun) is the much awaited Supreme Court decision on the question which has arisen in the last couple

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll