header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 July 2009 / Jane Foulser McFarlane
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

God & the Stormtroopers

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jane Foulser McFarlane assesses how far toys can be used for role play without breaching copyright

A German pastor intent on educating children about the Easter story, via his website, has been accused of violating the copyright in plastic Playmobil figures, by gluing breasts onto a model to depict “Eve” and by melting the hands of another model with a hairdryer, to allow it to depict Christ on the crucifix. The pastor was told to dismantle the figures by the company, Playmobil, which accused him of a deliberate and creative adaptation of its toys.

The plight of the pastor from Hesse was highlighted in an article in the Daily Telegraph in April, and is an example of how an innocuous adaptation of a toy figure can breach the provisions of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA 1988). The pastor had published his creations on his website for educational purposes, as opposed to commercial gain, but was he actually in breach of Playmobil’s copyright under UK law?

The German toy manufacturer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll