header-logo header-logo

Hague 19 ratified: what next for victims?

02 August 2024 / Chris Deacon
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
184272
Chris Deacon examines the limitations of the Hague Judgments Convention for the victims of accidents abroad in the EU
  • Hague 19 provides a framework for recognising and enforcing judgments between the courts of contracting states. When it comes into force in the UK next year, it will significantly widen the scope for enforcing a UK judgment in the EU27.
  • Although a constructive step forward, it has several limitations, including in relation to victims of an accident abroad who return to the UK and choose to bring proceedings in their home courts.

The Hague Conference on Private International Law has confirmed that on 27 June 2024, the UK deposited its instrument of ratification of the Hague Judgments Convention (Hague 2019), an international convention that provides a framework for recognising and enforcing judgments between the courts of contracting states.

Hague 2019 will enter into force in the UK on 1 July 2025 and will apply to proceedings commenced from that date onwards. It forms an important part of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll