header-logo header-logo

Lift off for Budgetary Control*

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

So, what is “budgetary control”?
Budgetary control is a control technique whereby results are compared with budgets.

  • Any differences (variances) are made the responsibility of key individuals who can either exercise control action or revise the original budgets.
  • Control is provided by comparisons of actual results against budget plan. Departures from budget can then be investigated and the reasons for the differences can be divided into controllable and non-controllable factors.
  • Budgetary control enables remedial action to be taken as variances emerge.

Budgetary control will be the most important task of the party’s case manager/partner because CPR 3.18 provides (Rule 11) that when assessing costs on the standard basis the court will:

  • Have regard to the receiving party’s last approved or agreed budget for each Phase of the proceedings (CPR 3.18(a)); and
  • Not depart from such approved or agreed budget unless satisfied there is good reason
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll