header-logo header-logo

Lift off for Budgetary Control*

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

So, what is “budgetary control”?
Budgetary control is a control technique whereby results are compared with budgets.

  • Any differences (variances) are made the responsibility of key individuals who can either exercise control action or revise the original budgets.
  • Control is provided by comparisons of actual results against budget plan. Departures from budget can then be investigated and the reasons for the differences can be divided into controllable and non-controllable factors.
  • Budgetary control enables remedial action to be taken as variances emerge.

Budgetary control will be the most important task of the party’s case manager/partner because CPR 3.18 provides (Rule 11) that when assessing costs on the standard basis the court will:

  • Have regard to the receiving party’s last approved or agreed budget for each Phase of the proceedings (CPR 3.18(a)); and
  • Not depart from such approved or agreed budget unless satisfied there is good reason
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll