header-logo header-logo

New orders seek protection for abuse victims

15 March 2018
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse perpetrators could be electronically tagged or forced to attend programmes to address their attitudes under new Domestic Abuse Protection Orders.

Breaching an order would be a criminal offence. Where abuse involves or affects a child, this would be counted as an aggravating factor during sentencing. A Domestic Abuse Commissioner would be appointed to hold the government to account.

These and other proposals were published last week in the consultation, Transforming the Response to Domestic Abuse, ahead of a draft Domestic Abuse Bill.

For the first time, economic abuse is recognised as a type of domestic abuse, protecting victims whose finances are withheld, or who are denied access to employment or transport.

It offers a new statutory definition of domestic abuse as ‘any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse…’.

‘Controlling behaviour’ is defined as ‘a range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape and regulating their everyday behaviour’.

Family law solicitor-advocate and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘It concentrates on: promoting awareness of domestic abuse; the issue of protection and support of victims; and how to “pursue and deter” perpetrators.

‘A lawyer will be concerned with the third: police response and improving the experience of the justice system of “victims” (they are not “victims”; nothing is proved yet); and with what the Ministry of Justice makes of it all in the current review of legal aid.’

Views are sought by 31 May 2018.

Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll