header-logo header-logo

Next steps for Litvinenko’s widow

26 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Diplomatic fall-out from coroner’s report will be “significant” Alexander Litvinenko’s murderers are unlikely ever to face justice, although the diplomatic fall-out from Sir Robert Owen’s coroner’s report will be “significant”, according to a leading lawyer writing in this week’s NLJ.

Russian dissident and ex-KGB whistleblower Alexander Litvinenko succumbed to a highly toxic radioactive isotope in a London hospital nine years ago. Sir Robert’s report, published last month, formally accused Vladimir Putin of personally authorising Litvinenko’s death, and Russian citizens Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitry Kovtun of executing the terrible deed with a poisoned teapot in a London hotel in 2006. The campaign for justice being waged by Litvinenko’s widow and son may continue, writes Louis Flannery, head of international arbitration at Stephenson Harwood, in this week’s NLJ, although he questions what can actually be done.

The home secretary has said she will place asset freezes against Lugovoy and Kovtun, and apply for their extradition. Interpol and European Arrest Warrants against them are in place. However, both men are in Russia. They could be tried in absentia, Flannery suggests, but their convictions would secure little apart from recognition of their guilt. Flannery notes that Putin enjoys sovereign immunity so that neither a criminal trial nor even a civil suit against him would be possible.

One avenue of justice may remain for Mrs Litivinenko and her son. Flannery writes: “In her first year as a widow, she took Russia to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for violating her husband’s right to life. “Those proceedings were suspended pending the inquest-turned-inquiry. It is believed that the publication of the report will almost certainly lead to her reactivating them.”

Even if successful, of course, “Russia does not exactly have a record of being a happy payer of judgment debts. There is also the additional problem of the uncertainty in terms of damages. But in principle, there is nothing to stop that process continuing now, and one would expect the ECtHR judges to be sympathetic to the claimants.” (see: Murder most foul)

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll