header-logo header-logo

24 March 2021
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Priorities for Boyce presidency

I Stephanie Boyce has taken over the reins at Chancery Lane, making history as the Law Society’s first president of colour

I Stephanie Boyce has taken over the reins at Chancery Lane

Boyce, who worked in-house before setting up her own consultancy, is the 177th president, the sixth woman president and the second in-house solicitor to hold the office in the past 50 years. Her previous roles include director of legal services at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and legal advisor at the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

In her inaugural speech, she set out three priorities for her term. First, genuine equal opportunities and treatment in the profession and judiciary. Noting that solicitors with disabilities, solicitors with caring responsibilities and solicitors from minority ethnic backgrounds continue to face obstacles, she pledged to work to address retention and progression gaps in the profession.

This is a time of change for solicitors, for their organisations, and for the country,’ she said.

‘The door is open, and the trail is ready to be blazed.’

Second, access to justice and technology. Recognising the importance of technology for the justice system throughout the pandemic, she emphasised that justice must be accessible to all, especially those with poor digital skills, disabilities, or a lack of equipment, internet access or financial resources.

Third, promoting digital engagement, good mental health and the rule of law. Boyce said lockdown caused the Law Society to create more opportunities for digital engagement with its members. To continue this, she announced the launch of a free, virtual course, ‘Introduction to Legal Technology’, which explains what lawtech is, the types of technology available for an individual law practice, and how it can be used. Find the course at www.learn.lawsociety.org.uk.

Boyce vowed to protect the rule of law and the integrity of the legal profession from attack, highlighting that solicitors ‘must be able to do their job without fear of intimidation’.

Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll