header-logo header-logo

05 December 2018
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Protection needed for UK rights & reputation

Government urged to support justice system at home

Action must be taken to preserve the global reputation of British legal services in the post-Brexit era, Bar leaders have warned.

Some 1,790 barristers undertook international work in 2017, earning £322m (an increase of £31m on the previous year), according to Bar Council figures. This compares to earnings of £90m in 2004. Overall, the legal services sector contributed £26bn to the UK economy in 2016, according to private sector advocacy group TheCityUK.

Bar Chair Andrew Walker QC urged the government to support the justice system at home, guarantee cross-border practice rights for UK and EU lawyers and ensure there are mutual rules applying to jurisdiction and judgments between the UK and the EU.

Walker said: ‘Mutual rules on jurisdiction and judgments between the UK and the EU, and on market access for lawyers, are not part of the current Political Declaration, yet they are vital if small UK firms are to stand a chance of trading successfully with the EU, and if our citizens’ rights are not to be undermined. We urge the government to prioritise a deal on these points during any transition period.’

He added that, while ‘the UK is the world’s number on legal centre’, the competition from Singapore, New York and Europe cannot be ignored.

Giving his inaugural speech this week, incoming Bar Chair Richard Atkins QC said: ‘We must fight to preserve: legal professional privilege and rights of audience where possible; access to justice through a comprehensive system of civil judicial cooperation… a flexible regime for the movement of persons which among other things ensures effective access for our

Issue: 7820 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll