header-logo header-logo

A regrettable blunder

07 April 2011 / Alexander Learmonth KC
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Alexander Learmonth investigates an unusual case of two wills being signed & executed by the wrong testators

The recent decision in Marley v Rawlings [2011] EWHC 161 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 43 (Feb), raised an interesting point of principle: could the power to rectify a will under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (AJA 1982) be used to cure a defect of execution of a will?  Could such an error be categorised as a “clerical error”?

The facts are simple but, one hopes, unusual. Mr and Mrs Rawlings wished to make mirror wills, each leaving everything to the other, and the survivor leaving everything to their carer, and quasi-adopted son Mr Marley. But when the solicitor supervised the execution of these wills, he handed Mr Rawlings the will intended for Mrs Rawlings and vice-versa, and each signed and executed the wrong will. Neither the solicitor nor his secretary witnessing the execution spotted the error, and it was not picked up on the death of Mrs Rawlings, whose property passed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll