header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011 / Alexander Learmonth KC
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

A regrettable blunder

Alexander Learmonth investigates an unusual case of two wills being signed & executed by the wrong testators

The recent decision in Marley v Rawlings [2011] EWHC 161 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 43 (Feb), raised an interesting point of principle: could the power to rectify a will under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (AJA 1982) be used to cure a defect of execution of a will?  Could such an error be categorised as a “clerical error”?

The facts are simple but, one hopes, unusual. Mr and Mrs Rawlings wished to make mirror wills, each leaving everything to the other, and the survivor leaving everything to their carer, and quasi-adopted son Mr Marley. But when the solicitor supervised the execution of these wills, he handed Mr Rawlings the will intended for Mrs Rawlings and vice-versa, and each signed and executed the wrong will. Neither the solicitor nor his secretary witnessing the execution spotted the error, and it was not picked up on the death of Mrs Rawlings, whose property passed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll