Rock: clarity on contracts?

15 June 2018 / Sally Anne Blackmore , Clifford Darton , Samantha Dawkins

Issue: 7797 / Categories: Features , Commercial

An exceptional appeal; a purist’s outcome. Lessons from MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd by Clifford Darton, Sally Anne Blackmore & Samantha Dawkins

On 16 May 2018, the Supreme Court decided that the law should and does give effect to no oral modification clauses.
This reversed the decision in the Court of Appeal and sounded the death knell for a line of authority suggesting that oral modification was possible notwithstanding the presence of a no oral modification clause in a contract.
This article considers the decision in context and asks why the Court of Appeal went wrong on so fundamental an issue.

MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd (MWB) operates serviced offices in central London (see also MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24, [2018] ALL ER (D) 81 (May). On 12 August 2011, Rock Advertising Ltd (Rock) entered into a contractual licence with MWB to occupy office space for twelve months commencing on 1 November 2011 at a fee of £3,500

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Rock: clarity on contracts?

An exceptional appeal; a purist’s outcome. Lessons from MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd by Clifford Darton, Sally Anne Blackmore & Samantha Dawkins

On 16 May 2018, the Supreme Court decided that the law should and does give effect to no oral modification clauses.
This reversed the decision in the Court of Appeal and sounded the death knell for a line of authority suggesting that oral modification was possible notwithstanding the presence of a no oral modification clause in a contract.
This article considers the decision in context and asks why the Court of Appeal went wrong on so fundamental an issue.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms

Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape

Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: AI boom collides with courtroom reality

Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Courts walk a tightrope on relocation & abuse

Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes

NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock

The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement

Error message

Rock: clarity on contracts?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan