header-logo header-logo

Save criminal justice

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Significant cuts have brought system to its knees, report warns 

The Law Society has called for the legal aid means test to be uprated, following a devastating report into the state of the criminal justice system.

Published last week, the report, ‘Justice on Trial 2019’ details a shortage of criminal law solicitors due to low fees for legal aid work. The average age of a criminal duty solicitor across the whole of England and Wales is now 47 years, a demographic that means areas of the country could be left unrepresented in the future.

The report criticises ‘release under investigation’, which leaves suspects and victims in limbo for months while police decide whether to pursue the case. Disclosure delays can prolong unnecessary legal processes.

Many people on low incomes who are accused of a crime are forced to pay fees or contributions they can’t afford due to the legal aid means test. Those who sit above the legal aid threshold incur an ‘innocence tax’—they can be found not guilty but, since 2012, can only claim back costs at legal aid rates, which often leaves a 50%-75% shortfall. Meanwhile, court closures are making it harder for many people on low incomes to attend hearings.

The society also supports the introduction of an independent legal aid task force to analyse the funding required to make the system sustainable; reducing delays by stopping courts from using ‘warned’, ‘block’ and ‘floating’ lists of cases that might not go ahead; and increasing remuneration rates to retain lawyers in the criminal law field.

Other key recommendations were for the Defence Solicitor Call Centre (DSCC) to be replaced by an automated system, and for the introduction of a centralised IT system for booking legal visits to prisoners.

Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll