header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing guidelines revised for assault

‘Spitting or coughing’ and ‘disease transmission’ would count as aggravating factors when sentencing for assault, under revised draft sentencing guidelines for assault offences

The Sentencing Council published revised draft guidelines last week for seven assault offences, including common assault, attempted murder and assaulting an emergency worker. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the draft guidelines class ‘intention to cause fear of serious harm, including disease transmission’ as a new high-culpability factor, while ‘spitting or coughing’ is an aggravating factor.

Sentencing Council spokesperson, Mr Justice Julian Goose, said: ‘Assault offences can be very personal crimes. It is important that sentences should be appropriate and proportionate, and reflect the harm caused to victims.

‘When in force, they will provide protection in the years ahead for the public and the people who serve them by providing public services or as emergency workers.’

The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 introduced a higher statutory maximum sentence of 12 months for offences of common assault against people specified as emergency workers.

The guidance for attempted murder has been revised to reflect changes to legislation where weapons are taken to the scene. The main thrust of the revisions is change to the way the seriousness of assault offences is assessed―the culpability and harm factors are more specific, and there is a greater number of offence categories and sentence starting points and ranges.

Judges, magistrates, lawyers and members of the public are invited to respond to the consultation by 15 September 2020. The guidelines are expected to come into force next year.

The consultation, ‘Assault offences consultation’, is available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/consultations/assault-offences-consultation.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll