header-logo header-logo

Sentencing guidelines revised for assault

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
‘Spitting or coughing’ and ‘disease transmission’ would count as aggravating factors when sentencing for assault, under revised draft sentencing guidelines for assault offences

The Sentencing Council published revised draft guidelines last week for seven assault offences, including common assault, attempted murder and assaulting an emergency worker. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the draft guidelines class ‘intention to cause fear of serious harm, including disease transmission’ as a new high-culpability factor, while ‘spitting or coughing’ is an aggravating factor.

Sentencing Council spokesperson, Mr Justice Julian Goose, said: ‘Assault offences can be very personal crimes. It is important that sentences should be appropriate and proportionate, and reflect the harm caused to victims.

‘When in force, they will provide protection in the years ahead for the public and the people who serve them by providing public services or as emergency workers.’

The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 introduced a higher statutory maximum sentence of 12 months for offences of common assault against people specified as emergency workers.

The guidance for attempted murder has been revised to reflect changes to legislation where weapons are taken to the scene. The main thrust of the revisions is change to the way the seriousness of assault offences is assessed―the culpability and harm factors are more specific, and there is a greater number of offence categories and sentence starting points and ranges.

Judges, magistrates, lawyers and members of the public are invited to respond to the consultation by 15 September 2020. The guidelines are expected to come into force next year.

The consultation, ‘Assault offences consultation’, is available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/consultations/assault-offences-consultation.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll