header-logo header-logo

Whistleblowing: eyes on the prize?

25 June 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
51885
Is it time for the UK to consider financial rewards for whistleblowers? John Bowers QC weighs up the pros & cons
  • Offering monetary rewards to those who blow the whistle, as in the US, has thus far had a lukewarm reception in the UK, with concerns surrounding motivations and increased antagonism.
  • However, it is clearly desirable—both morally and economically—to encourage whistleblowers to come forward, and the possibility of reward may provide more of a reason to do so.

Bradley C Birkenfeld, a former banker at UBS, served two and a half years in prison for conspiring with a wealthy California developer to evade United States income taxes. He was convicted of fraud for withholding crucial information from federal investigators, including details of his top client, the property developer Igor Olenicoff.

Yet, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made Birkenfeld’s post-prison life just a little bit easier by granting him in 2012 a reward of $104m for whistleblowing—not for blowing the whistle on his own activities, but by divulging the schemes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll