header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Will it float?

74103533_4

Keith Davies explores two novel attempts to obtain land—& water—through adverse possession

IN BRIEF

  • A public right of way cannot be extinguished by disuse, however long the period of non-use.
  • There could be circumstances in which the owner of a vessel moored on a tidal river might acquire title by adverse possession to a part of the river bed or foreshore.

Sometime before May 1995, Wayne Smith arrived with his caravan on a country lane in Cambridgeshire near the village of Willingham. This lane is marked on Cambridgeshire County Council’s definitive map of public rights of way in accordance with the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as a “byway open to all traffic” (BOAT).

In the resulting dispute over registration, Arden LJ in her judgment said that Smith took up residence with his caravan “and associated structures”. He “provides window cleaning services” and trimmed hedges, and the evidence shows that he was “an established and valued member of the community”.

He applied to the Land Registry for first registration of title (presumably freehold)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll