header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Will it float?

74103533_4

Keith Davies explores two novel attempts to obtain land—& water—through adverse possession

IN BRIEF

  • A public right of way cannot be extinguished by disuse, however long the period of non-use.
  • There could be circumstances in which the owner of a vessel moored on a tidal river might acquire title by adverse possession to a part of the river bed or foreshore.

Sometime before May 1995, Wayne Smith arrived with his caravan on a country lane in Cambridgeshire near the village of Willingham. This lane is marked on Cambridgeshire County Council’s definitive map of public rights of way in accordance with the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as a “byway open to all traffic” (BOAT).

In the resulting dispute over registration, Arden LJ in her judgment said that Smith took up residence with his caravan “and associated structures”. He “provides window cleaning services” and trimmed hedges, and the evidence shows that he was “an established and valued member of the community”.

He applied to the Land Registry for first registration of title (presumably freehold)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll