If there have been cross decrees for dissolution, should separate decrees nisi be perfected by the court...
In a low velocity impact personal injury claim there seems to be some conflict between the Casey v Cartright procedure and Husain v Amin and another...
Is service of a claim form by the court in contravention of the claimant’s request to serve himself...
On applications for permission to remove a child from the jurisdiction, a Cafcass report on the child’s wishes and feelings will often be ordered...
The requirement for a costs estimate with the allocation/directions questionnaire appears to have been scrapped...
When judgment is entered in an unspecified claim why is it in terms that it is for an amount to be decided...
Simon Goldie explains how to give your firm a competitive edge
Martin Burns offers a guide to identifying conflicts of interest in dispute resolution
Graham Chase considers the use of ADR to resolve landlord & tenant disputes
Dominic Regan is in the mood for some end-of-term high-jinx
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
JMW—Belinda Brooke
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
