As the Court of Appeal widens the application of the Montgomery consent test, Philippa Luscombe explores the implications for claimants
AB v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 25, [2017] All ER (D) 14 (Apr)
PP v Home Office and another [2017] EWHC 663 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 18 (Apr)
Jonathan Herring considers a tragic case concerning the right to withhold invasive medical treatment
Thales UK Ltd v Thales Pension Trustees Ltd and others [2017] EWHC 666 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 21 (Apr)
Finding the suit that’s right for you requires a little thought & consideration, as Dale Rhodes explains
Isle of Wight Council v Platt [2017] UKSC 28, [2017] All ER (D) 20 (Apr)
Alec Samuels suggests a solution to the problems at the Bar
Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency); Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] All ER (D) 12 (Apr)
Andrew Francis offers some best practice guidance when advising developers on applications under s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok
Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok
Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon
Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise
Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce
Three new tenants join Twenty Essex
Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application
