header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7377

09 July 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

Jordans is a name associated with both cereal bars and legal publishing. Crisp, wholesome, well-balanced and nourishing, the law books leave little to be desired.

Simon Young uncovers the truth behind rumours of increased premiums & unprofessional conduct

Jonathan Cohen unravels some of the complexities of trade mark infringement under European law

Smith has forced the courts to re-evaluate the concept of control,says Brent McDonald

Should Orthodox Hindus in the UK have the right to conduct open air funeral pyres? Nicholas Dobson reports

How can landlords guarantee they receive rent payments when insolvency looms? James Naylor & Claire Southway investigate

Ali and others v Birmingham City Council; Manchester City Council v Moran [2009] UKHL 36, [2009] All ER (D) 19 (Jul)

Re Paycheck Services 3 Ltd and other companies; Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Holland and another [2009] EWCA Civ 625, [2009] All ER (D) 24 (Jul)

Sagal (trading as Bunz UK) v Atelier Bunz GMBH [2009] EWCA Civ 700, [2009] All ER (D) 40 (Jul)

News In Brief

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll