header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7384

10 September 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

To what extent are intellectual property rights matrimonial assets? asks Jane Foulser McFarlane

Does Brennan mark the end of the bonus culture in local authorities? asks Daphne Romney QC

Solicitors and other third party professionals have been implicated in a £41 million buy-to-let mortgage fraud.

Mike Pilgrem gets to the nub of disagreements between experts

Graham Smart on the pivotal role of loss adjusters in insurance related litigation

TM v London Borough of Hounslow [2009] EWCA Civ 859, [2009] All ER (D) 17 (Sep)

RCI Europe v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-37/08 [2009] All ER (D) 25 (Sep)

R (on the application of Bary and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 2068 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 59 (Aug)

R (on the application of S) v A Social Security Commissioner [2009] EWHC 2221 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 16 (Sep)

Re Bluebrook Ltd and other companies [2009] EWHC 2114 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 101 (Aug)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll