header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7427

21 July 2010
IN THIS ISSUE
Let me be the judge Premium Content

Was Rose Gibb’s final settlement irrationally generous? Nicholas Dobson reports

22 July 2010 / Nicholas Dobson
Going live! Premium Content

Robbie Constance & Hans Allnutt explain the new Ombudsman Scheme & analyse recent regulatory risks

22 July 2010 / Robbie Constance / Hans Allnutt
Civil procedure—Privilege—Law Society Premium Content

Quinn Direct Insurance Ltd v The Law Society of England and Wales [2010] EWCA Civ 805, [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Jul).

22 July 2010
Costs—Assessment—Estimate of costs Premium Content

Rowles-Davies and others v Call 24-7 Ltd [2010] EWHC 1695 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 96 (Jul).

22 July 2010
Winning at what cost? Premium Content

Karen O’Sullivan on the lessons to be learned from two important appeals

22 July 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
The power of PR Premium Content

James Darley proposes a new coalition of wig & pen

22 July 2010 / James Darley
Law digest: 23 July 2010 Premium Content

Company; Customs and excise; Libel; Extradition; Broadcasting; Shipping

22 July 2010
The law in 101 words Premium Content

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

22 July 2010 / Roderick Ramage
Case dismissed on boy’s time out of school

Art 2 right judged to be non-absolute

22 July 2010
Privilege right upheld

Quinn ruling protects privileged information

22 July 2010
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
NLJ this week: How not to plead a schedule of loss
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll