The decision in Jones v Kernott has turned a complex area of law into a minefield, says Jonathan West
Patrick Allen rallies against anti-referral fee rhetoric
Does BTE insurance offer freedom of choice, asks David Greene
Malcolm Keen considers apportionment in discrimination claims
Jonathan Herring tackles paternity testing & capacity
Keith Davies reports on store wars in Wolverhampton
Andrew Parsons deliberates over the court’s approach to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment
Is the common European sales law a Trojan horse, asks Stephan Balthasar
On and on. X Factor? No, the credit hire litigation....
Mark Surguy & Saida Joseph examine the latest methods for the outsourcing of document review
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie
Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law
7670829bf5ee4855af368e509c9111b6.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=d9eca78_1)
Birketts—Álvaro Aznar
Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
