Michael L Nash

Lecturer

Michael L Nash, Visiting Fellow of UEA Business School, and Advocate to the Diocesan Tribunal of East Anglia. Newlawjournal.co.uk

Lecturer

Michael L Nash, Visiting Fellow of UEA Business School, and Advocate to the Diocesan Tribunal of East Anglia. Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Go to page of 5

Michael L Nash examines the delicate balancing act between the three pillars of power in times of crisis

The death of Emiliano Sala mid-transfer left a tangled web of contractual issues, writes Michael L Nash

A child who is the great-grandson of a reigning Queen could never be anything but royal, as Michael Nash explains

Michael Nash explores how far the customs & conventions of the Royal Family have evolved

Michael L Nash explores Ireland’s departure from, & possible return to, the Commonwealth

Michael L Nash continues the story of the birth of the House of Windsor

In its centenary year, Michael L Nash reflects on the birth of the House of Windsor

Michael L Nash considers the legal pitfalls of Mary Tudor & Queen Elizabeth II

Show

Results

Go to page of 5

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: The insider returns

Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome

NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt

After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights

NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers

The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains

NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was

Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously

NLJ this week: How not to plead a schedule of loss

A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever

Error message

Michael L Nash

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

HFW—Guy Marrison