header-logo header-logo

Claire Sanders examines the principles of freezing orders in matrimonial proceedings as highlighted by ND v KP

Gary Yan & Tom Phillips provide a cross-check on ring fencing assets

Edward Floyd highlights the difficulty of revisiting ancillary relief orders

Jamie Wilson reports on uncertain times in a post Imerman era

The effective taking of guarantees is a critical stage in the provision of finance by banks and similar institutions.

In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.

Why pensions merit attention throughout a divorce, explains Caroline Wright

Amy Taylor reports on non-disclosure & the Hildebrand myth

James Riby expounds on interim relief & the division of chattels

Caroline Wright & Nigel Dyer QC consider how Agbaje will affect the divorce courts at home & abroad

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll