header-logo header-logo

Employment

Subscribe

When are employers responsible for workplace stress? Michelle Marnham investigates

Flexible working is a must, not an optional extra, for carers says Christine Jenner

The case law in the last month has demonstrated a current approach to the statutory procedures that seems to vary from the weariedly explanatory to the downright exasperated.

Despite the valiant efforts of judges, doubts persist about the true status of agency workers, says Bruce Gardiner

Tess Gill considers the effects of recent rulings
on call-out time in the working week

INJUSTICE AND MENTAL DISORDER >>
DEFICIENT DOCTORS >>
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS >>
CARE WORKERS’ RIGHTS >>

Where should the balance lie between an elected official’s right to private life and adherence to a statutory code? Sultana Tafadar looks at the Livingstone case

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll