header-logo header-logo

Training & education

Subscribe

Lucy Chakaodza explains how legal professionals can expand their skills & choices through ADR training

Ann Collier & Tamsin Kennie explain the benefits & challenges behind “real time” learning

Alexandra Marks provides inspiration & advice for would-be judges

Robert Brown provides a lesson on multi-lingual e-Discovery

Jane Ching & Natalie Byrom grapple with the present & future demands of legal services education

Peter Nussey explains how to help bridge the gap between training & work

Peter Whitman highlights the attractions of mediation over contested dispute

Jenny Rawstorne studies the implications of the outcomes-focused qualified lawyers transfer scheme

Nick Jarrett-Kerr suggests routes towards the expansion of educational horizons for lawyers

Bryan Greetham emphasises the importance of encouraging original thought through legal training

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll