header-logo header-logo

Training & education

Subscribe

Dr Sue Prince & Dr Tom Begbie consider attempts to rethink social diversity in the legal profession

Martin Burns argues that greater promotion is the key to the future of mediation

Peter Nussey explains how to help bridge the gap between training & work

Laura Shirley reports on how the SRA intends to overhaul the CPD treadmill

Is becoming a paralegal a safer move to qualification? Jane Ching investigates

Joe Reevy provides ten tips for long-term survival

Jane Ching looks at making the most of, & going beyond, CPD

The head of the independent safeguarding authority is to clarify proposals announced last week for a vetting system for those working with children.

Part two: Who should pay for additional educational needs? Andrew Ritchie QC

LDPs, ABSs & MDPs...Dr Clare McConnell unravels the changes springing from LSA 2007

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll