header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 4 July 2019

04 July 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Smith applauds some recent performances by the Court of Appeal but pans the non-statutory antics of some members of the supporting cast

  • Sorting out a glitch about voluntary overtime.
  • Offers by employers to give up collective bargaining.
  • Perceived disability that the claimant might develop the condition.
  • Remedies for unfair dismissal—a narrow escape

Several years ago, one lord justice commented that he had always thought that slavery had been abolished in Britain until he was appointed to the Court of Appeal. That court has certainly been busy with employment cases in the last month, in four cases spread right across the subject. They have corrected a potentially major gaffe by the ECJ (in a suitably to-the-point judgment), given the first authoritative interpretation to a provision of collective labour law introduced 15 years ago, extended the scope of perceived disability to cases where the employer wrongly believed that the employee might develop a particular condition, and lastly stamped on an attempt to graft a non-statutory remedy on to the statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll