header-logo header-logo

04 July 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 4 July 2019

Ian Smith applauds some recent performances by the Court of Appeal but pans the non-statutory antics of some members of the supporting cast

  • Sorting out a glitch about voluntary overtime.
  • Offers by employers to give up collective bargaining.
  • Perceived disability that the claimant might develop the condition.
  • Remedies for unfair dismissal—a narrow escape

Several years ago, one lord justice commented that he had always thought that slavery had been abolished in Britain until he was appointed to the Court of Appeal. That court has certainly been busy with employment cases in the last month, in four cases spread right across the subject. They have corrected a potentially major gaffe by the ECJ (in a suitably to-the-point judgment), given the first authoritative interpretation to a provision of collective labour law introduced 15 years ago, extended the scope of perceived disability to cases where the employer wrongly believed that the employee might develop a particular condition, and lastly stamped on an attempt to graft a non-statutory remedy on to the statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

The government will aim to pass legislation banning leasehold for new flats and capping ground rent, introducing non-compulsory digital ID and creating a ‘duty of candour’ for public servants (also known as the Hillsborough law) in the next Parliament

An Italian financier has lost his bid to block his Australian wife from filing divorce papers in England on the basis it was no longer her domicile of choice

Reforms to the disclosure regime in the business and property courts have not achieved their objectives, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll