header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010 / Andrew Burns KC , Alice Carse
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A flight of fancy?

Andrew Burns & Alice Carse report on collective agreements in employment contracts

In 2009 British Airways (BA) was facing serious financial difficulties as a result of the collapse in premium business travel and the rise in fuel prices.  BA started to negotiate cost savings with all sections of its workforce and needed to make saving from cabin crew costs of £140 million. In February 2009 negotiations began with UNITE the Union. 

Two rival sections within the union, BASSA and Cabin Crew 89, were separately represented at the talks. BA proposed a reduction in crew complement (the manning levels on each particular flight) as a cost-saving scheme to enable cabin crew members to take voluntary redundancy or become part-time workers. Counter proposals put forward by UNITE were not acceptable to BA and negotiations did not make progress.  Unfortunately there was a serious disagreement between BASSA and Cabin Crew 89 and talks stagnated and then collapsed when BASSA and Cabin Crew 89 refused to negotiate together at ACAS.

After these months of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll