header-logo header-logo

Flying high

istock_000015703940medium_4

Charles Pigott reports on soaring retirement ages

Last month’s decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Prigge v Deutsche Lufthansa AG C-447/09 is about three German airline pilots who were made to retire at 60. Their employer relied on a term in a collective agreement providing for automatic termination of their employment at the age of 60. Both German and international aviation legislation allows pilots to continue to fly between the ages of 60 and 65 as long as they do so as part of a crew with at least one pilot under the age of 60.

Abiding by the Directive

The ECJ had to decide whether the collective agreement infringed the Employment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC). It needed to look at three provisions of the Directive:
 

  • Article 2(5), which excludes measures from the scope of the Directive which, among other things, are necessary for the protection of health;
  • Article 4(1), which creates an exemption for a “genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is legitimate
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll