header-logo header-logo

Flying high

istock_000015703940medium_4

Charles Pigott reports on soaring retirement ages

Last month’s decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Prigge v Deutsche Lufthansa AG C-447/09 is about three German airline pilots who were made to retire at 60. Their employer relied on a term in a collective agreement providing for automatic termination of their employment at the age of 60. Both German and international aviation legislation allows pilots to continue to fly between the ages of 60 and 65 as long as they do so as part of a crew with at least one pilot under the age of 60.

Abiding by the Directive

The ECJ had to decide whether the collective agreement infringed the Employment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC). It needed to look at three provisions of the Directive:
 

  • Article 2(5), which excludes measures from the scope of the Directive which, among other things, are necessary for the protection of health;
  • Article 4(1), which creates an exemption for a “genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll