header-logo header-logo

Flying high

istock_000015703940medium_4

Charles Pigott reports on soaring retirement ages

Last month’s decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Prigge v Deutsche Lufthansa AG C-447/09 is about three German airline pilots who were made to retire at 60. Their employer relied on a term in a collective agreement providing for automatic termination of their employment at the age of 60. Both German and international aviation legislation allows pilots to continue to fly between the ages of 60 and 65 as long as they do so as part of a crew with at least one pilot under the age of 60.

Abiding by the Directive

The ECJ had to decide whether the collective agreement infringed the Employment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC). It needed to look at three provisions of the Directive:
 

  • Article 2(5), which excludes measures from the scope of the Directive which, among other things, are necessary for the protection of health;
  • Article 4(1), which creates an exemption for a “genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is legitimate
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll