header-logo header-logo

16 July 2021 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Levelling up access to justice (Pt 2)

52821
In a second special update on the justice system, Roger Smith turns his attention to technology, private practice & low income clients

Last month, ownership of QualitySolicitors passed to yet another venture capitalist firm. Metamorph’s celebration was upbeat: this was part of its plan to be ‘one of the leading law groups focused on the private client and SME market’. Truth to tell, however QualitySolicitiors, has actually proved a bit of a dud. Formed in 2009 with high hopes, members never hit remotely near the original target of 1,000. Turnover was reported as under £1m last year. However, the news is significant for those interested in the impact of technology on legal practice for people on low incomes.

QualitySolicitors, let us remind ourselves, was formed originally as a response to Co-operative Legal Services (CLS), the pioneer in nationally branded, fixed fee, variously packaged services. The emergence of this alternative business structure with an internet interface and array of packages panicked the solicitors’ legal profession. ‘Are we’, they wondered,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll