header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Reforming employment tribunals

The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the employment tribunal system, including expanding tribunals’ powers, increasing damages awards and extending time limits

The independent Commission, which advises the government on law reform, published its review of the jurisdiction of employment tribunals this week.

Its recommendations include giving tribunals powers to decide breach of contract claims brought while the employee is still employed―currently, the employee must have left before bringing a claim.

The time limit for bringing all types of employment tribunal claims would be six months (as opposed to three months for some claims) and tribunals would have discretion to extend this where ‘just and equitable’ to do so. Tribunals would also be given the power to award damages of up to £100,000 for breach of contract claims, instead of the current £25,000 limit. The Commission said this would remove the need for claims to be pursued in two different courts.

Other recommendations include allowing tribunals to hear employee complaints that they are working hours in excess of maximum working time limits, and reforming enforcement procedures to ensure employees receive their compensation in a timely fashion.

Finally, the Commission proposes deploying judges with experience in discrimination claims in the county court to hear discrimination cases outside the employment law field. There is an overlap of jurisdiction between the courts and the tribunals, as noted by Lord Justice Briggs in his 2016 Civil Courts Structure Review.

Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: ‘Employment tribunals play an important role in resolving disputes and protecting the rights of workers, however the system is not working as well as it should.

‘The reforms that we have recommended will bring real benefits for the courts and tribunals system and its users. The adjustments will improve employment tribunals’ ability to resolve employment disputes as effectively and justly as possible in one place.’

 

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll