header-logo header-logo

Reforming employment tribunals

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the employment tribunal system, including expanding tribunals’ powers, increasing damages awards and extending time limits

The independent Commission, which advises the government on law reform, published its review of the jurisdiction of employment tribunals this week.

Its recommendations include giving tribunals powers to decide breach of contract claims brought while the employee is still employed―currently, the employee must have left before bringing a claim.

The time limit for bringing all types of employment tribunal claims would be six months (as opposed to three months for some claims) and tribunals would have discretion to extend this where ‘just and equitable’ to do so. Tribunals would also be given the power to award damages of up to £100,000 for breach of contract claims, instead of the current £25,000 limit. The Commission said this would remove the need for claims to be pursued in two different courts.

Other recommendations include allowing tribunals to hear employee complaints that they are working hours in excess of maximum working time limits, and reforming enforcement procedures to ensure employees receive their compensation in a timely fashion.

Finally, the Commission proposes deploying judges with experience in discrimination claims in the county court to hear discrimination cases outside the employment law field. There is an overlap of jurisdiction between the courts and the tribunals, as noted by Lord Justice Briggs in his 2016 Civil Courts Structure Review.

Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: ‘Employment tribunals play an important role in resolving disputes and protecting the rights of workers, however the system is not working as well as it should.

‘The reforms that we have recommended will bring real benefits for the courts and tribunals system and its users. The adjustments will improve employment tribunals’ ability to resolve employment disputes as effectively and justly as possible in one place.’

 

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll