header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Reforming employment tribunals

The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the employment tribunal system, including expanding tribunals’ powers, increasing damages awards and extending time limits

The independent Commission, which advises the government on law reform, published its review of the jurisdiction of employment tribunals this week.

Its recommendations include giving tribunals powers to decide breach of contract claims brought while the employee is still employed―currently, the employee must have left before bringing a claim.

The time limit for bringing all types of employment tribunal claims would be six months (as opposed to three months for some claims) and tribunals would have discretion to extend this where ‘just and equitable’ to do so. Tribunals would also be given the power to award damages of up to £100,000 for breach of contract claims, instead of the current £25,000 limit. The Commission said this would remove the need for claims to be pursued in two different courts.

Other recommendations include allowing tribunals to hear employee complaints that they are working hours in excess of maximum working time limits, and reforming enforcement procedures to ensure employees receive their compensation in a timely fashion.

Finally, the Commission proposes deploying judges with experience in discrimination claims in the county court to hear discrimination cases outside the employment law field. There is an overlap of jurisdiction between the courts and the tribunals, as noted by Lord Justice Briggs in his 2016 Civil Courts Structure Review.

Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: ‘Employment tribunals play an important role in resolving disputes and protecting the rights of workers, however the system is not working as well as it should.

‘The reforms that we have recommended will bring real benefits for the courts and tribunals system and its users. The adjustments will improve employment tribunals’ ability to resolve employment disputes as effectively and justly as possible in one place.’

 

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll