header-logo header-logo

Reforming employment tribunals

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the employment tribunal system, including expanding tribunals’ powers, increasing damages awards and extending time limits

The independent Commission, which advises the government on law reform, published its review of the jurisdiction of employment tribunals this week.

Its recommendations include giving tribunals powers to decide breach of contract claims brought while the employee is still employed―currently, the employee must have left before bringing a claim.

The time limit for bringing all types of employment tribunal claims would be six months (as opposed to three months for some claims) and tribunals would have discretion to extend this where ‘just and equitable’ to do so. Tribunals would also be given the power to award damages of up to £100,000 for breach of contract claims, instead of the current £25,000 limit. The Commission said this would remove the need for claims to be pursued in two different courts.

Other recommendations include allowing tribunals to hear employee complaints that they are working hours in excess of maximum working time limits, and reforming enforcement procedures to ensure employees receive their compensation in a timely fashion.

Finally, the Commission proposes deploying judges with experience in discrimination claims in the county court to hear discrimination cases outside the employment law field. There is an overlap of jurisdiction between the courts and the tribunals, as noted by Lord Justice Briggs in his 2016 Civil Courts Structure Review.

Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: ‘Employment tribunals play an important role in resolving disputes and protecting the rights of workers, however the system is not working as well as it should.

‘The reforms that we have recommended will bring real benefits for the courts and tribunals system and its users. The adjustments will improve employment tribunals’ ability to resolve employment disputes as effectively and justly as possible in one place.’

 

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll