header-logo header-logo

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Where are all the magistrates?

Numbers fall by 10,000 over six-year period

The magistracy is in ‘near crisis’, MPs have warned, with a shortfall in numbers that is ‘as frustrating as it was foreseeable’.

The Justice Committee this week called for a national strategy to recruit and train more magistrates, including extra funds for training, in its report, ‘The role of the magistracy―follow-up’. It said magistrates are struggling with reduced support and feel undervalued, while the court closure programme has created additional challenges.

The report reiterates issues raised in a Justice Committee report in 2016, which identified serious recruitment and training problems and called for the development of a national strategy as a matter of priority.

The number of magistrates―volunteers who sit in panels of three and may sentence offenders to up to six months in prison―has fallen from more than 25,000 in 2012 to about 15,000 in 2018. The report notes that magistrates have a high average age and have to retire at 70, indicating future gaps unless recruitment improves.

The MPs’ report recommends the government make it easier for working people to take time off work to volunteer as magistrates. It suggests the government consider increasing magistrates sentencing powers to up to 12 months, on the grounds that this could reduce crown court congestion and delays in sentencing offenders. Currently, magistrates must refer cases to the crown court if they are likely to incur a sentence longer than six months.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘Morale is not improving, despite the minister’s efforts to reassure us.

‘The shortage of magistrates could have been avoided had the government adopted our initial recommendation on recruitment. The action promised three years ago has failed to materialise, and we again call for an appropriate national strategy.’

The Ministry of Justice offered judges a temporary salary boost earlier this month in a bid to tackle the recruitment crisis. As well as a 2% pay rise across all tiers, High Court judges enrolled in the 2015 pension scheme are to receive a 25% (upped from an earlier offer of 11%) rise, and an extra 15% is being offered on a temporary basis to circuit and upper tribunal judges. 

Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll