header-logo header-logo

Where are all the magistrates?

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Numbers fall by 10,000 over six-year period

The magistracy is in ‘near crisis’, MPs have warned, with a shortfall in numbers that is ‘as frustrating as it was foreseeable’.

The Justice Committee this week called for a national strategy to recruit and train more magistrates, including extra funds for training, in its report, ‘The role of the magistracy―follow-up’. It said magistrates are struggling with reduced support and feel undervalued, while the court closure programme has created additional challenges.

The report reiterates issues raised in a Justice Committee report in 2016, which identified serious recruitment and training problems and called for the development of a national strategy as a matter of priority.

The number of magistrates―volunteers who sit in panels of three and may sentence offenders to up to six months in prison―has fallen from more than 25,000 in 2012 to about 15,000 in 2018. The report notes that magistrates have a high average age and have to retire at 70, indicating future gaps unless recruitment improves.

The MPs’ report recommends the government make it easier for working people to take time off work to volunteer as magistrates. It suggests the government consider increasing magistrates sentencing powers to up to 12 months, on the grounds that this could reduce crown court congestion and delays in sentencing offenders. Currently, magistrates must refer cases to the crown court if they are likely to incur a sentence longer than six months.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘Morale is not improving, despite the minister’s efforts to reassure us.

‘The shortage of magistrates could have been avoided had the government adopted our initial recommendation on recruitment. The action promised three years ago has failed to materialise, and we again call for an appropriate national strategy.’

The Ministry of Justice offered judges a temporary salary boost earlier this month in a bid to tackle the recruitment crisis. As well as a 2% pay rise across all tiers, High Court judges enrolled in the 2015 pension scheme are to receive a 25% (upped from an earlier offer of 11%) rise, and an extra 15% is being offered on a temporary basis to circuit and upper tribunal judges. 

Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll