header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7811

05 October 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

In the first of a special series of LexisNexis Legal Awards Profiles, we speak to David Pryce, the managing partner of 2018's Law Firm of the Year, Fenchurch Law

Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet

Claire Kitchen shares best practice advice on how to deal with the actions & behaviours of the perpetrators of harassment & stalking

97, 98, 100; new CPR update; bonus for ice cream vans; cold calling targeted.

The High Court rules that the MIB is an emanation of the state. Nicholas Bevan reports.

Can there be an express declaration of trust, without any declaration? Mark Warwick QC investigates

Clarity on non-party documentation: David Burrows investigates the power to order production of documents in family cases

Steve Hynes welcomes the Labour party’s commitment to widening access to justice & hopes the government will track back from LASPO

Modern family types outside marriage for heterosexuals to be recognised

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll