header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7376

02 July 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

Tracey Bloom & Kate Markus report on the complexities of eviction action & the obligation to house minors

Kenneth Warner considers the scope of an assumed duty of care

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why successful tribunal claimants are often short-changed

Jeremy Nixon ponders the trickle-down effect of the MPs’ expenses scandal

David Burrows examines the relationship between judicial discretion & the law

Bribery

Employment

Code of practice highlights best (and worst) practices in data privacy

Court of Appeal rules admissions policy at Jewish school is discriminatory

Viewpoint

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll